Firm News & Announcements
The court considered the Plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, and a pause on the agency’s enforcement of the Keeping Families Together program. After reviewing the briefings, hearing the arguments from attorneys, and assessing the applicable law, the Court has decided to grant the Plaintiffs’ motion. It is ordered that, until the Court issues a further decision, the Defendants are restrained and preliminary enjoined from implementing, operating, or continuing the PIP Program, including the Notice, the Filing Guide, and Form I-131F. And that the effective date of the PIP Program is delayed.
It is further ordered that every Monday, the Defendants must submit reports to the Court detailing the following:
1) The number of parole applications received under the PIP Program,
2) The number of parole applications processed,
3) The number of parole applications approved,
4) The number of parole applications denied,
5) The number of parole applicants who had previously applied for any form of immigration benefits or relief (including the I-601A Application for Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver), and
6) The number of applicants who had previously submitted biometric or other personal information that was used to adjudicate a PIP application.
USCIS is still accepting applications for now, but this could change at any time due to ongoing litigation.
citizens. This process is part of an initiative to enhance family unity and stability, boost economic growth in American communities, enhance diplomatic ties with regional partner countries, and alleviate pressure on U.S. government resources.
Ur M. Jaddou, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, highlighted that noncitizen spouses of U.S. citizens often face unnecessary challenges in the immigration system. She emphasized that the new process will help keep families together by removing these barriers for those eligible to live and work legally in the U.S., while also improving the system's efficiency, ensuring effective screening, and prioritizing noncitizens who contribute to and have deep ties within American communities.
Starting August 19, 2024, USCIS will receive requests from eligible individuals. Those who wish to apply must file online Form I-131F, Application for Parole in Place for Certain Noncitizen Spouses and Stepchildren of U.S. Citizens, after creating a myUSCIS account. The filing fee is $580. Requests for a fee waiver for Form I-131F will not be considered.
To be considered eligible, noncitizen spouses of U.S. citizens must:
• Be present in the United States without admission or parole;
• Have been continuously physically present in the United States since at least June 17, 2014, through the date of filing your request;
• Have a legally valid marriage to a U.S. citizen on or before June 17, 2024;
• Have no disqualifying criminal history and otherwise not deemed to be a threat to public safety, national security, or border security; and
• Submit biometrics and undergo required background checks and national security and public safety vetting.
Noncitizen stepchildren of U.S. citizens must: • Have been under the age of 21 and unmarried on June 17, 2024;
• Be present in the United States without admission or parole;
• Have been continuously physically present in the United States since at least June 17, 2024, through the date of filing your request;
• Have a noncitizen parent who entered into a legally valid marriage with a U.S. citizen on or before June 17, 2024, and before their 18th birthday;
• Have no disqualifying criminal history and otherwise not deemed to be a threat to public safety, national security, or border security; and • Submit biometrics and undergo required background checks and national security and public safety vetting.
USCIS is dedicated to maintaining program integrity and preventing fraud. USCIS will use current training and methods to review evidence of legally valid marriages submitted with Form I-131F. USCIS will implement thorough procedures to identify and address potential fraud, ensuring that fraudulent marriages do not result in status adjustments through this process.
DHS estimates that around 500,000 noncitizen spouses and 50,000 noncitizen stepchildren of U.S. citizens may qualify under these criteria. If granted parole, these individuals, provided they meet other eligibility requirements, could apply for lawful permanent residence without having to leave the country.
Keeping Families Together aligns with established, congressionally endorsed policies, including a similar process for family members of specific U.S. military personnel and veterans.
To be considered for PIP, the applicant must:
• Reside in the United States without admission or parole;
• Have continuously lived in the United States for a minimum of 10 years as of June 17, 2024;
• Be legally married to a U.S. citizen as of June 17, 2024;
• Not have a disqualifying criminal record or pose a threat to national security or public safety.
Noncitizen children of spouses granted parole through this process may also be considered for parole if they are physically present in the U.S. without admission or parole and have a qualifying stepchild relationship with a U.S. citizen parent as of June 17, 2024.
The individual who qualifies may be granted parole for up to three years and can apply for permanent residence (green card) without having to leave the U.S.
Individuals should wait for further details to be provided. USCIS will not accept any submissions related to this process that are received before the application process officially starts. In the meantime, individuals can start gathering supporting documentation, including:
• Documentation of proof of identity, such as a driver’s license, a valid passport;
• Evidence of legal marriage to a U.S. citizen as of June 17, 2024, such as a marriage certificate;
• Evidence of spouse’s U.S. citizenship, such as passport, birth certificate, Certificate of Naturalization;
• Documentation to establish the noncitizen has been continuously present in the U.S. for at least 10 years as of June 17, 2024, such as rent receipts or utility bills, school records, medical records, dated bank transactions, insurance policies, tax returns;
Watch out for fraud and seek legal advice from a recognized attorney. USCIS is not yet accepting applications and there is no waiting line.
Introduced in 2017, The International Entrepreneur Rule allows the Department of Homeland Security to use its parole authority to grant temporary stays to noncitizen entrepreneurs on a case-by-case basis. This rule targets entrepreneurs whose startup entities have the potential for rapid growth and job creation, offering a substantial public benefit.
If an entrepreneur is granted parole, they will be allowed to work only for their startup entity as part of their parole conditions. Additionally, if the entrepreneur's spouse is also granted parole, they can apply for permission to work in the United States. Entrepreneur’s children may also be eligible for parole but cannot apply for employment authorization.
Some key elements of the International Entrepreneur Rule state that the entrepreneur may be living either outside or inside the United States but the startup entity must have been formed in the U.S. within the past five years. The entrepreneur may be granted a two-and-a-half initial parole period and if approved for re-parole, they may receive up to another two and a half years, for a maximum of five years. Up to three entrepreneurs can be eligible for parole per startup entity.
The final International Entrepreneur Rule mandates that USCIS update the investment and revenue thresholds in 8 CFR 212.19 every three years for inflation. The next scheduled adjustment will occur on October 1, 2024.
In accordance with the regulation, the following adjustments will be implemented:
Beginning in Fiscal Year 2025 (October 1, 2021), for an initial application, entrepreneurs need to prove their startup has a strong potential for rapid growth and job creation by showing that within 18 months before applying for initial parole, they have received at least $311,071 (previously $264,147) in investments from one or more qualified investors, or at least $124,429 (previously $105,659) in one or more eligible government awards or grants.
Alternatively, if they only partially meet these investment or award requirements, can provide other strong and credible evidence of the startup entity’s potential for significant growth and job creation.
For the entrepreneur to renew their authorized stay under the International Entrepreneur Rule, they typically need to show that the startup has either: Obtained a qualified investment, qualified government grants or awards, or a combination of such funding totaling at least $622,142 (currently $528,293); created a minimum of five qualified jobs during the initial parole period; or achieved annual revenue in the United States of at least $622,142 (currently $528,293) and maintained an average annual revenue growth of at least 20%.
A "qualified investor" is defined as an investor with a history of making significant investments in successful startup entities. A qualified investor should have invested in startup entities a minimum of $746,571 (currently $633,952) in a specific 5-year period and, following these investments, at least two of the startup entities each created a minimum of five qualified jobs or generated at least $622,142 (previously $528,293) in revenue with an average annual revenue growth of at least 20%.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is revising its Policy Manual to address public feedback about how children acquire citizenship. They are also updating guidelines in response to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Sessions v. Morales-Santana, 582 U.S. 47 (2017), and providing clarity on other citizenship acquisition rules.
The guidance, included in Volume 12 of the Policy Manual, takes effect immediately and applies to pending applications or those filed on or after the publication date. Policy Highlights:
States that individuals who previously submitted an application for a Certificate of Citizenship that was denied, but who can become eligible due to a USCIS policy change, can submit a request to have their denied application reconsidered.
Makes clear that a U.S. citizen parent can satisfy the physical presence requirement in the United States (or outlying possession) before the child’s birth, regardless of their immigration status, including having no status.
Explains that if a child born out of wedlock to two U.S. citizen parents cannot acquire U.S. citizenship through the father, the mother can fulfill the requirement by showing 1 year of continuous physical presence in the United States or one of its territories before the child’s birth.
Confirms that, to acquire citizenship at birth, USCIS mandates that a parent must be legally recognized as the child's parent by the appropriate jurisdiction at the time of the child’s birth.
Explains that a child gains citizenship under statutes where all requirements must be fulfilled while the child is under 18 years old, even if the final condition is met on their 18th birthday. Likewise, a child qualifies for citizenship under INA 322 if USCIS approves the application and the child takes the oath (if necessary) on their 18th birthday.
Confirms that USCIS recognizes a valid and unexpired U.S. passport or a Consular Report of Birth Abroad (CRBA) as proof of U.S. citizenship. However, USCIS also assesses whether the applicant acquired U.S. citizenship correctly and may ask the Department of State to revoke the U.S. passport or cancel the CRBA before processing an application for a Certificate of Citizenship.
Explains procedures for USCIS when reviewing claims of U.S. citizenship for an applicant’s parents or grandparents, in addition to the applicant's own claim (referred to as "nested claims of U.S. citizenship"). When assessing applications for a Certificate of Citizenship, if it's uncertain whether the applicant’s parent or parents were U.S. citizens, the officer must first establish the U.S. citizenship status of the applicant’s parents (and potentially grandparents) before deciding on the applicant’s citizenship claim.
Explains that in applications for naturalization filed under the provision for children of a U.S. citizen who suffered battery or extreme cruelty, the stepchild does not need to maintain a relationship with the U.S. citizen stepparent at the time of the naturalization application.
Giving this information prompts the USCIS to either keep the approved petition for adjustment of status processing or send the petition to the NVC for consular processing. Not providing the correct information on the petition, can stall the process of immigrant visa or adjustment of status. If USCIS retains a petition because incorrect information was provided, the petitioner must file Form I-824, Application for Action on an Approved Application or Petition, paying the corresponding fee, in order to hand over the petition to the NVC.
Before the update was issued, USCIS kept approved petitions that not clearly specify if the beneficiary whishes adjustment of status or consular processing. This update explains procedures for family-based immigration petitions in order to boost efficient processing in cases where it is unclear whether the beneficiary prefers a consular processing or adjustment of status, or if there is a change in the process or a correction is needed.
The update indicates that if the petitioner does not indicate clearly if the beneficiary wishes consular processing or adjustment of status, USCIS will use discretion to choose whether to send the approved petition to the NVC for consular processing or maintain the petition for adjustment of status process, depending on the beneficiary’s evidence of most recent location, including the address on the petition.
The updated guidance explains how you can contact USCIS to correct an error or update a pending or approved Form I-130. This includes revising the beneficiary’s location and indicating if they prefer a consular processing or adjustment of status. It also provides advice on how USCIS decides to approve or deny a family-based immigrant petition.
A church in Albuquerque, New Mexico, tried to file a R-1 Visa for a South African pastor but was denied.
The R-1 visa allows foreigners to work as religious workers in churches or religious organizations for up to five years. The South African citizen was hired by the church and received honoraria and allowances while in the US on a B-1 visitor visa, before his R-1 Visa was approved. When the pastor went to the consulate in Johannesburg to obtain his R-1 Visa, the officials denied the visa stating that the pastor misreported his intention of entering the US as a tourist when he intended to participate in unapproved work as an independent contractor for the church.
When the church tried to appeal the denial, the court dismissed the appeal stating that the pastor violated his status by engaging in unauthorized employment within 90-days of his entry to the US.
Both the pastor and the church also tried to challenge the denial saying it violated their right under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) by impeding the church’s freedom to select its ministers and determine their compensations. The court ruled that the RFRA protection is bound by a doctrine of consular nonreviewability that limits the court’s ability to reverse decisions made by consular officials. The court also added that the visa denial did not stop the church from employing another pastor or following their compensations beliefs.
This case can serve as a reminder of the importance to be cautious and avoid any actions before or during the petition process that could potentially compromise the result. Also, organizations that are sponsoring religious workers should understand the limitations of RFRA.
The final rule includes several key elements: • Updating and clarifying definitions such as serious harm, abuse, and law enforcement agency to align with the standards outlined in the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000.
• Enhancing program efficiency by clarifying reporting and evidentiary requirements to minimize requests for additional evidence.
• Simplifying the process for law enforcement agencies to respond to trafficking reports by mandating that victims report instances of trafficking to the appropriate law enforcement authorities.
• Making the process of determining authenticity and adjudicating cases simpler, while still maintaining measures to prevent fraud.
In 2016, DHS enacted an interim rule in response to public input on the T visa program, aiming to refine requirements in line with statutory modifications, institutionalize insights from over 14 years of program operation, and adjust provisions to comply with intervening legislation. In July 2021, DHS reopened the public comment period for the interim rule for 30 days and later extended the comment deadline. The final rule incorporates the modifications from the 2016 interim rule, provides clarity to the current regulatory structure, and addresses the feedback received from the public.
The DHS plays a crucial role in fighting against human trafficking, safeguarding the nation, and working closely with other organizations to prevent these crimes. Established in 2020, the DHS Center for Countering Human Trafficking brings together 16 DHS units to address human trafficking through activities such as law enforcement operations, aiding and protecting victims, intelligence and analysis, and public education and training programs. Also, through the Blue Campaign, it leads the Department’s nationwide initiative to raise public awareness and combat human trafficking. DHS has expanded its focus to include combating online child sexual exploitation and abuse, following the addition of combating crimes of exploitation and protecting victims as a sixth mission area in April 2023 during the Department’s Quadrennial Homeland Security Review.
Form I-956F may only be filed by an approved regional center. Form I-956F allows regional centers to apply for approval for each particular investment offering through an associated new commercial enterprise.
Form I-956G incorporates increased statutory reporting requirement under the revised program.
The Filing Fees are as Follows:
Form I-956F-$17,795
Form I-956G-$3,035
If you have any questions about hoe the immigration and nationality laws in the United States may impact you or your family, please call MC Law Group at (702)238-1093.
Premium Processing to be implemented for certain previously filed EB-1 and EB-2 form I-140 petitions
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services are implementing premium processing for certain petitioners who have a pending Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers, under the EB-1 and EB-2 classifications. This expansion of premium processing only applies to certain previously filed Form I-140 petitions under an E13 multinational executive and manager classification or E21 classification as a member of professions with advanced degrees or exceptional ability seeking a national interest waiver (NIW). Petitioners who wish to request a premium processing upgrade must file Form I-907, Request for Premium Processing Service.
The expansion will occur in phases:
- Beginning June 1, 2022, we will accept Form I-907 requests for E13 multinational executive and manager petitions received on or before Jan. 1, 2021.
- Beginning July 1, 2022, we will accept Form I-907 requests for E21 NIW petitions received on or before June 1,2021, and E13 multinational executive and manager petitions received on or before March 1, 2021.
We will reject premium processing requests for these classifications that are filed before their start date of June 1,2022, or July 1, 2022. We will not accept new (initial) Forms I-140 with a premium processing request at this time.
On May 23, 2022, we published a new version of Form I-907, dated 05/31/22. For the month of June, we will accept both the 09/30/20 and the 05/31/22 editions of Form I-907. Starting July 1, we will reject the older 09/30/20 edition of Form I-907.
As previously announced, we are expanding premium processing to additional form types as part of our efforts to increase efficiency and reduce burdens to the overall legal immigration system.
Please reach out to an expert immigration attorney who can guide you through these new processes.
1. There is a shortage of workers in all areas of the US economy currently. Signs like: “The entire world is short staffed.
PLEASE be kind to the awesome employees that showed up today. WE appreciate your patience” is so common on the streets of America, it’s not even funny anymore – what is congress planning to do about it?
2. The work authorizations for spouses of H-1Bs (H-4) were not included in the new I-94S program – why?
3. When Congress voted to expend the Premium Processing for broader categories, was the intent to have USCIS implement those starting only in 2026?
4. EB-5 Program reform was a welcome news. Also, welcoming was allowing those in the US on different other non-immigrant visas (H-1Bs, L-1, O, P, etc.) to allow them to file Adjustment of status while waiting for their I-526 decisions.
However, there are thousands of EB-5 investors, who invested over $500,000 and created 10 US jobs) currently waiting more than 5 years in just processing time (note waiting for visa availability time) for their cases to be adjudicated and such a prolonged wait time was not addressed for those lawfully waiting their turn outside the US.
Any plans to address and allow them to enter at least on HP since they want their lives in the US start as promised (within normal processing times) not 5 years before they ever see their green card.
5. With the war in Ukraine continuing and the Uniting Ukraine HP program, which was rolled out April 25, 2022, closing the Southern Border Crossing into the US by Ukrainians -- yet TPS eligibility is for those physically present as of April 11, 2022 – any plans to expend it until April 25, 2022 to allow those last lucky war-torn sufferers to obtain TPS status?
6. AAA for Afghanis – what is the current environment in the Congress and Senate to implement this crucial to US global reputation program?
7. The Congress and Courts have long agreed that an exception should be carved out for parents bringing their children with them when they come to the US and such exemption from trafficking illegal alien charges was practiced for decades; however, during Trump administration, it was suddenly and arbitrarily changed without any court ruling nor Congress decision.
Now, all parents who at some point brought their children to the United States without authorization are being charged with smuggling their, now US citizen, children to the United States even if it was not done by them.
For example, I had a very fresh case where a father of a US citizen, who was divorced from his spouse at the time but still sending them child support, was charged with smuggling and not allowed to receive an immigrant visa at the consulate in Mexico although he said that he did not even know the mother of his children was bringing them to the US.
The consular officer asked if he provided any financial support for his children, when he acknowledged it, the officer said – then you paid for their processing and denied his otherwise approvable immigrant visa based on this statement.
Multiple suggestions were offered by Margo and her colleagues about ways that the government can improve on the issued raised above. Other concerns included the long delays in hearing schedules and prejudice treatment of immigrants in the immigration courts.
Unfortunately, meetings with our congressional representatives cannot solve immigration problems immediately.
However, Margo hopes that by bringing the issues to Senators and Congress by sharing real examples will help government representatives know and understand how the dysfunctionality of the US immigration and nationality law system is negatively impacting the lives of U.S. citizens and their international family members as well as U.S. businesses and the entire U.S. economy.
Learn More
US Immigration Lawyer – Advising Clients On Immigration Matters
Las Vegas Immigration Attorney – Helping With Visas, Green Cards, And More
Our Las Vegas Immigration Lawyers are here to help :
- Our Avvo reviews, along with Margo Chernysheva’s 9.6/10 rating, speak volumes about our award-winning attorneys and law firm.
- Our lawyers provide honest and aggressive representation to individuals and top businesses.
- We are proud to be one of the best immigration law firms in the states of California and Nevada.
- When you work with us, you will have the pleasure of working with a skilled and knowledgeable immigration lawyer.
Welcome to MC Law Group “Las Vegas Immigration Attorney”, your trusted partner in navigating the complex landscape of US immigration and legal matters with a global perspective. Our team of Las Vegas immigration lawyers brings a wealth of experience to individuals and businesses alike, offering unparalleled expertise in the intricacies of immigration law. Whether you’re an individual seeking personalized guidance or a business in need of comprehensive immigration solutions, MC Law Group is your premier choice.
Why Choose MC Law Group for Your Immigration Needs?
International Focus
Our attorneys specialize in US immigration law with a distinct international focus. With our central office located in Las Vegas, NV, MC Law Group is uniquely positioned to provide seamless legal counsel. We understand the nuances of global immigration, ensuring that your legal needs are met with precision and efficiency.
Proven Expertise
MC Law Group takes pride in its experienced immigration team which has successfully handled a myriad of cases. Whether you’re navigating family-based immigration, employment visas, or corporate immigration matters, we possess the knowledge and acumen to secure favorable outcomes for our clients.
Tailored Solutions
At MC Law Group, we recognize that every immigration case is unique. Our Las Vegas Immigration attorneys are committed to crafting tailored solutions that address your specific needs and circumstances. We take a personalized approach to ensure that you receive the attention and representation you deserve.
Comprehensive Services
Beyond immigration, MC Law Group offers a spectrum of legal services to individuals and businesses. Our expertise extends to various legal matters, providing you with a one-stop solution for your legal needs. From employment law to corporate representation, our attorneys are
well-versed in diverse legal disciplines.
Schedule Your Consultation Today
If you’re seeking the guidance of an experienced Las Vegas immigration attorney, MC Law Group is ready to assist you. To discuss your immigration needs or any other legal matters, contact us by phone or e-mail to schedule a consultation. Our dedicated team is committed to providing you with the highest level of professional service, ensuring a smooth and successful resolution to your legal concerns.
Choose MC Law Group for a legal partner that goes beyond expectations, delivering excellence in every aspect of immigration and legal representation. Your journey to a secure and successful future starts with us.
Practice Areas
U.S. Business Immigration
We help employers transfer or hire foreign professionals and obtain appropriate visas.
Employment Immigration
We routinely help U.S.-based employers acquire H-1B, L Visa, and TN visas.
Family Immigration
We help citizens, and permanent residents sponsor and reunite with loved ones.
EB-5 Investor Visas
We help investors meet the requirements and obtain the EB-5 visa.
H-1B Visas
We help U.S.-based employers acquire the H-1B work visa.
Fiancé Visas
We can help U.S. citizens obtain a K-1 visa for that special person.
L-1 Visa , O-1 Visa and P-1 Visas
We help artists, athletes, and others with extraordinary skills obtain visas.
DACA Immigration
We also represent the “Dreamers,” and we know the challenges they face.
Business Immigration
We help employers transfer or hire foreign professionals and obtain appropriate visas.
Employment Immigration
We routinely help U.S.-based employers acquire H-1B, L, and TN visas.
Family Immigration
We help citizens, and permanent residents sponsor and reunite with loved ones.
EB-5 Investor Visas
We help investors meet the requirements and obtain the EB-5 visa.
H-1B Visas
We help U.S.-based employers acquire the work visas they need.
Fiancé Visas
We can help U.S. citizens obtain a K-1 visa for that special person.
E1 E2 Investor Visas
We help international traders and investors obtain an E-1 or E-2 visa.
L-1, O-1 and P-1 Visas
We help artists, athletes, and others with extraordinary skills obtain visas.
DACA Immigration
We also represent the “Dreamers,” and we know the challenges they face.
About Margo Chernysheva
Every year, immigration and visa applications are denied for no other reason than missing paperwork or improperly filled out application forms. By seeking the help of Attorney Margo Chernysheva, immigration and visa applicants can ensure they have the best possible chance of having their applications approved.
Attorney Margo Chernysheva is an experienced professional that can help with investor visas, marriage visas, work visas, and more. She is a mediator and arbitrator with years of experience who has been authorized by the Nevada State Bar and the Nevada Supreme Court’s Foreclosure Mediation Program, and she is also available to provide mediation and arbitration services for clients based in Nevada.
Read More
Client & Colleague Testimonials
Las Vegas Immigration And Naturalization Service
Immigration law can be a minefield of paperwork, regulations and requirements that, if not properly met, can place a person at risk of losing or never being able to attain the right to live and work in the U.S. Laws in the United States affecting migration continue to evolve and change as migration remains a hot-button political issue. Every year, immigration and visa applications are denied for no other reason than missing paperwork or improperly filled out application forms. By seeking the help of an experienced Las Vegas migration attorney, migration and visa applicants can ensure they have the best possible chance of having their applications approved. To learn more about working with our law firm, feel free to read the Google Plus reviews of Margo Chernysheva.
Our main Las Vegas Immigration Lawyer Office is located in Spring Valley, Las Vegas near the Crossroads Plaza Shopping Center and Flamingo Promenade Shopping Center, approximately 13 miles from McCarran International Airport (LAS). Merge onto I-215 W from the McCarran International Airport in Las Vegas. Continue onto Co Road 215 W and take exit 19 for Russell Road.
Merge onto Brent Thurman Way, and make an immediate right onto W Hacienda Avenue. Make two more immediate rights before turning left onto Spanish Ridge Avenue. Our office is located on the right. To schedule a consultation with one of the top immigration lawyers in Las Vegas, please call 702-258-1093 or fill out the form on this website. During the consultation, you will learn more about the immigrant legal services we offer, and how we can help you find success and reach your immigration goals.